The
Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 17 No 2 (2013): 291 – 299
OPTIMIZATION of A distillation unit in terms of POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ECONOMICS
(Pengoptimuman Unit Penyulingan dari Segi Potensi Impak
Ekonomi dan Alam Sekitar)
Alhassan
Salami Tijani1*, Naveed Ramzan2
1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Universiti Teknologi
MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
2Department of Chemical Engineering,
University of Engineering and
Technology, G.T Road Lahore (54890) Lahore-Pakistan
*Corresponding author: alhassan@salam.uitm.edu.my
Abstract
Process energy
integration and continuous improvement of process technology are increasing
issues to ensure profitability of chemical productions. These objectives are
increasingly important due to long-term environmental impact of energy
degradation, such as resource depletion, emissions and the release of “waste”
heat. The earlier energy conservation, process economics and environmental aspects
are integrated into the process development, the easier and less expensive it
is to improve the process design. In this work different distillation process
design alternatives have been considered with respect to evaluations of process
economics and potential environmental impacts. “Optimum design alternatives”
are analyzed related to these objectives. A multi-criteria decision making
technique such as (Analytic Hierarchy Process) AHP is applied for ranking the
alternatives. This method reveals that the heat pump distillation unit which
has the highest score of 52 % is the best alternative when compare with base
case. In terms of the effluent streams the base case has a less potential
environmental impact (PEI) compared with heat pump. The lower total PEI/kg
(7.45E-01) of the base case illustrates that the material utilization
efficiency of the base case is better than the heat pump whose PEI/kg is
8.14E-01.
Keywords: economic, thermodynamic efficiency,
distillation unit, waste reduction (WAR) algorithm
References
1.
Hui Chen, Ya
Wen, Michelle D. Waters, and David R. Shonnard. (2002). Design Guidance for
Chemical Processes Using Environmental
and Economic Assessments. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res, 41, 4503-4513.
2.
Teresa M. Mata,
Raymond L. Smith, Douglas M. Young, Carlos A.V. Costa. (2003). Evaluating the
environmental friendliness, economics and energy efficiency of chemical
processes: heat integration, Clean Techn
Environ Policy 5, 302–309.
3.
Dantus, M. M.; High, K. A. (1996). Economic Evaluation for the Retrofit of Chemical Processes
through Waste Minimization and Process Integration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
35, 4566.
4.
Cano-Ruiz, J. A.; McRae, G. J. (1998). Environmental Conscious
Chemical Process Design. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 23,499.
5.
Lou, H.H., Kulkarni, M.A., Singh, A. and
Hopper, J.R. (2004). Sustainability assessment for industrial systems. Ind Eng
Chem Res, 43(15): 4233–4242.
6.
Achour, M.H., Haroun, A.E., Schult,
C.J., et al. (2005). A new method to assess the environmental risk of a
chemical process Gasem. Chem Eng Process, 44(8): 901–909.
7.
Hau, J.L., Yi, H.S. and Bakshi, B.R., (2007).
Enhancing life cycle inventories via reconciliation with the laws of
thermodynamics. J Ind Ecol, 11(4): 1–21
8.
J. Rafael
Alca´ntara-Avila, Manabu Kano, Shinji Hasebe. (2012). Environmental and economic optimization of
distillation structures to produce anhydrous ethanol, 22nd European Symposium on
Computer Aided Process Engineering, 30: 712–716.
9.
Wang, M., Shi,
Y., Xia, X., Li, D., Chen, Q. (2013). Life-cycle energy efficiency and
environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sweet potato. doi: http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.01.067.
10.
Gomez-Castro, F.
I., Rico-Ramirez, V., Segovia-Hernandez, J. G., Hernandez-Castro, S., & El-
Halwagi, M. M. (2013). Simulation Study on Biodiesel Production by Reactive
Distillation with Methanol at High Pressure and Temperature: Impact on Costs
and Pollutant Emissions, Computers and
Chemical Engineering doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.01.007.
11.
Hilaly AK,
Sikdar SK. (1994) Pollution balance: a new method for minimizing waste
production in manufacturing processes. J
Air Waste Manag. Assoc 44:1303–1308.
12.
Young DM,
Cabezas H. (1999). Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the waste
reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comput Chem
Eng 23:1477–1491.
13.
Douglas Young, Richard Scharp, Heriberto
Cabezas. (2000). The waste reduction (WAR) algorithm: environmental impacts,
energy consumption, and engineering economics Waste Management 20 (2000)
605±615.
14.
Seider, W. D., Seader, J.D., Lewin, D.R., 2003, Product
and Process Design principles, Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation, John Willey
& Sons, Inc., New York. Pg. 142-145.
15.
Douglas, J. M., (1988). Conceptual
Design of Chemical Processes. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, pg.425-432.
16.
Satty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process;
McGraw-Hill: New York, pg. 560-601.