Malays. J. Anal. Sci. Volume 30 Number 2 (2026): 1718
Research
Article
Comparative
impact of natural crosslinking, plasticization, and hydrophobic additives on
the physicochemical properties of rice husk-starch biodegradable straws
Nur Irdina Kamarul Bahrin1, Rozaini
Abdullah1,2*, Ku Syahidah Ku Ismail1,3,
and Muhammad Akmal Amir4
1 Faculty of Chemical
Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis,
Malaysia
2 Centre of Excellence for
Frontier Materials Research, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, No. 64-66, Blok B,
Taman Pertiwi Indah, Jalan Kangar - Alor Setar, Kampung Seriab,
01000 Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia
3 Centre of Excellence for
Biomass Utilization, Kompleks Pusat Pengajian Jejawi 3, Kawasan
Perindustrian Jejawi, Universiti Malaysia Perlis,
02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
4 Ada Biotech Sdn Bhd, Lot 5497, Tingkat Mak
Mandin 4, Mak Mandin Industrial Estate, 13400 Butterworth, Pulau Pinang,
Malaysia
*Corresponding author: rozainiabdullah@unimap.edu.my
Received: 24 September 2025; Revised: 30 March 2026;
Accepted: 6 April 2026; Published: 28 April 2026
Abstract
Starch-based
biodegradable straws offer a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based
plastics, yet their practical application is limited due to poor water
resistance and insufficient mechanical strength. In the present study, drinking
straws made of corn starch, rice husk, carboxymethyl cellulose, and water were
prepared using a twin-screw extrusion process. To systematically evaluate
different chemical pathways, candelilla wax, glycerol, and citric acid were
introduced separately to investigate the effect of hydrophobic modification,
plasticization, and crosslinking under identical processing conditions. The
resulting drinking straws underwent comprehensive physicochemical
characterization, encompassing water uptake behavior,
mechanical flexural performance, FTIR spectroscopy analysis, and
thermogravimetric (TGA) profiling, followed by soil burial biodegradation. The
candelilla wax formulation exhibited the lowest water absorption (53.90 ±
2.99%) and the highest flexural strength (16.54 ± 1.86 MPa), whereas the citric
acid formulation achieved the lowest strength (9.33 ± 1.38 MPa), indicating
increased brittleness. All formulations demonstrated biodegradability, with the control showing
a degradation rate of 76.45 ± 8.27% after 28 days, while the modified
formulations showed lower degradation due to limited moisture diffusion. Overall,
hydrophobic modification via candelilla wax was the most balanced in
performance by improving moisture resistance and mechanical stability while
maintaining biodegradability.
Keywords: drinking straw, natural
crosslinking, candelilla wax, biodegradable, water resistance
References
1.
Roy, P., Ashton, L., Wang, T., Corradini, M. G.,
Fraser, E. D. G., Thimmanagari, M., Tiessan, M., Bali, A., Saharan, K. M., Mohanty, A. K., and
Misra, M. (2021). Evolution of drinking straws and their environmental,
economic and societal implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316,
128234.
2.
Ni, H., Li, H., Hou, W., Chen, J., Miao, S., Wang,
Y., and Li, H. (2024). From sea to sea: Edible, hydrostable,
and degradable straws based on seaweed-derived insoluble cellulose fibers and
soluble polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers, 334, 122038.
3.
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R.,
and Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science
Advances, 3(7), e1700782.
4.
Mazhandu, Z., Muzenda, E.,
Mamvura, T., Belaid, M., and Nhubu, T. (2020). Integrated and consolidated
review of plastic waste management and bio-based biodegradable plastics:
Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(20), 8360.
5.
OECD. (2022). Global plastics outlook: Economic
drivers, environmental impacts and policy options. OECD Publishing.
6.
Ritchie, H. (2023). How much plastic waste ends up
in the ocean? Our World in Data.
https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20251125-173858/how-much-plastic-waste-ends-up-in-the-ocean.html
7.
Zhang, K., Hamidian, A.
H., Tubić, A., Zhang, Y., Fang, J. K. H., Wu,
C., and Lam, P. K. S. (2021). Understanding plastic degradation and
microplastic formation in the environment: A review. Environmental Pollution,
274, 116554.
8.
Gao, Y., Guo, X., Liu, Y., Fang,
Z., Zhang, M., Zhang, R., You, L., Li, T., and Liu, R. H. (2018). A full
utilization of rice husk to evaluate phytochemical bioactivities and prepare
cellulose nanocrystals. Science Report, 8(1), 10482.
9.
Chen, H., Wang, W., Martin, J. C., Oliphant, A. J.,
Doerr, P. A., Xu, J. F., DeBorn, K. M., Chen, C., & Sun, L. (2012).
Extraction of lignocellulose and synthesis of porous silica nanoparticles from
rice husks. ACS Sustainability Chemical Engineering, 1(2), 254–259.
10. Nguyen, N. T.,
Tran, N. T., Phan, T. P., Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, M. X. T., Nguyen, N. N., Ko,
Y. H., Nguyen, D. H., Van, T. T. T., & Hoang, D. (2022). Extraction of
lignocelluloses and silica from rice husk using a single biorefinery process. Journal
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 108, 150–158.
11. Dorairaj, D., &
Govender, N. (2023). Rice and paddy industry in Malaysia: Governance and
policies. Frontier Sustainability Food System, 7, 1093605.
12. Johar, N., &
Ahmad, I. (2012). Properties of starch biocomposite
films reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals. BioResources,
7(4), 5469–5477.
13. Vieira, E. F.,
Amaral, T., Domingues, V. F., & Delerue-Matos, C. (2026). Hydrophobicity
strategies of starch-based films. Polymers, 18(4), 490.
14. Alexander, I., Sodri, A., & Mizuno, K. (2023). Effect of natural waxes
on hydrophobic properties. Journal Environmental Science Sustainability Development,
6(1), 86–101.
15. Tarique, J., Sapuan, S. M., & Khalina, A. (2021). Effect of glycerol
plasticizer loading. Science Report, 11(1), 1–14.
16. Wu, H., Lei, Y.,
Lu, J., Zhu, R., Xiao, D., Jiao, C., Xia, R., Zhang, Z., Shen, G., Liu, Y., Li,
S., & Li, M. (2019). Citric acid crosslinking on starch/chitosan films. Food
Hydrocolloids, 97, 105208.
17. He, X., Zhao, S.,
Zhang, Z., Dai, L., Qin, Y., Ji, N., Xiong, L., Shi, R., & Sun, Q. (2023).
Strategy for starch-based straws. International Journal Biology Macromolecules,
227, 1089–1097.
18. Choeybundit, W., Karbowiak, T., Lagorce,
A., Ngiwngam, K., Auras, R., Rachtanapun,
P., Noiwan, D., & Tongdeesoontorn,
W. (2024). Eco-friendly straws using soy protein isolate. Polymers,
16(13), 1887.
19. Zhang, J., Li, X.,
Wang, K., Zhu, Y., Guo, L., Cui, B., & Lu, L. (2024). Oil additives on
starch straws. Carbohydrate Polymers, 334, 122027.
20. Wang, K., Zou, F.,
Tao, H., Gao, W., Guo, L., Cui, B., Yuan, C., Liu, P., Lu, L., & Wu, Z.
(2023). Cooling temperatures on starch straws. Carbohydrate Polymers,
305, 120534.
21. Wei, X., Tang, J.,
Tao, H., Gao, W., Guo, L., Cui, B., Liu, P., Lu, L., Wu, Z., Fang, Y., Zhao,
M., Yang, N., & Huang, Q. (2022). Cellulose-reinforced starch straws. Industrial
Crops Products, 189, 115881.
22. Musa, B. H., & Hameed, N. J. (2021). A study
of the effect of starch content on the water absorption of PVA/starch blends. Engineering
and Technology Journal, 39(1B), 150–158.
23. Yusuf, Y., Irfandy,
F., & Istiani, A. (2022). Mathematical model of
water absorption in arrowroot starch-chitosan based bioplastic. Eksergi, 19(1), 35.
24. Ahmad, Z., Razak, N. H. A., Roslan, N. S. M.,
& Mosman, N. (2014). Evaluation of kenaf fibres
reinforced starch based biocomposite film through
water absorption and biodegradation properties. Journal of Engineering
Science, 10, 31.
25. Ortega-Toro, R., Gonzalez-Cuello, R., &
Cortes-Rodriguez, M. (2018). Starch- and PLA-based biocomposites:
interactions with water. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 11(40),
1983–1989.
26. Leroy, L., Stoclet, G., Lefebvre, J.-M.,
& Gaucher, V. (2022). Mechanical behavior of thermoplastic starch: Rationale
for the temperature-relative humidity equivalence. Polymers, 14(13),
2531.
27. Gomes, Á. V. R., Leite, R. H. de L., Silva
Júnior, M. Q. da, Santos, F. K. G. dos, & Aroucha,
E. M. M. (2019). Influence of composition on mechanical properties of cassava
starch, sisal fiber and carnauba wax biocomposites. Materials
Research, 22, 0887.
28. Hazrati, K. Z., Sapuan, S. M., Zuhri, M. Y. M., & Jumaidin, R. (2021). Effect of plasticizers on physical,
thermal, and tensile properties of thermoplastic films based on Dioscorea
hispida starch. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,
185, 219–228.
29. Esmaeili, M., Pircheraghi,
G., & Bagheri, R. (2017). Optimizing the mechanical and physical properties
of thermoplastic starch via tuning the molecular microstructure through
co‐plasticization by sorbitol and glycerol. Polymer International, 66(6),
809–819.
30. Chantawee, K., & Riyajan,
S.-A. (2018). Effect of glycerol on the physical properties of carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber/cassava starch blend
films. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 27(1), 50–60.
31. Gerezgiher, A. G., & Szabó, T. (2022). Crosslinking
of starch using citric acid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2315(1),
012036.
32. Arshad, Z., Jahan,
Z., Miran, W., Alshareef, R. S., & Niazi, M. B. K. (2026). Innovative
utilization of agricultural byproducts: development and analysis of
eco-friendly packaging materials from rice husk and wheat straw. Polymer
Bulletin, 83(5), 224.
33. Gomes, Á. V. R.,
Leite, R. H. de L., Silva Júnior, M. Q. da, Santos, F. K. G. dos, & Aroucha, E. M. M. (2019). Influence of composition on
mechanical properties of cassava starch, sisal fiber and carnauba wax biocomposites. Materials Research, 22, 8877.
34. Kawijia, K., Atmaka, W., & Lestariana, S. (2017). Study of characteristics whole
cassava starch based edible film with citric acid cross-linking modification. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian, 18(2), 143–152.
35. Sholichah, E., Purwono, B., &
Nugroho, P. (2017). Improving properties of arrowroot starch (Maranta
arundinacea)/PVA blend films by using citric acid as cross-linking agent. IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 101, 012018.
36. Chen, W. C., Nor,
S., Ghazali, S. K., Dayangku Intan Munthoub, Alias, H., Mohamad, Z., & Majid, R. A.
(2021). The effects of citric acid on thermal and mechanical properties of
crosslinked starch film. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 83, 199–204.
37. Guo, X., & Wu, Y. (2017). Characterizing
Molecular structure of water adsorbed by cellulose nanofiber film using in situ
micro-FTIR spectroscopy. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology,
37(5), 383–392.
38. Hofstetter, K., Hinterstoisser,
B., & Salmén, L. (2006). Moisture uptake in
native cellulose – the roles of different hydrogen bonds: a dynamic FT-IR study
using Deuterium exchange. Cellulose, 13(2), 131–145.
39. Kalutskaya, E. P., & Gusev, S. S. (1980). An
infrared spectroscopic investigation of the hydration of cellulose. Polymer
Science U.S.S.R., 22(3), 550–556.
40. Saberi, B., Vuong, Q. V., Chockchaisawasdee,
S., Golding, J. B., Scarlett, C. J., & Stathopoulos, C. E. (2016).
Mechanical and physical properties of pea starch edible films in the presence
of glycerol. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 40(6),
1339–1351.
41. Wang, L., Kan, J., Tang, L., & Abidin, S.
Z. (2025). The effects of glycerol addition on the physicochemical, structural
and mechanical properties of salt-gelatinized rice starch-based film. LWT,
218, 117427.
42. Kowalczyk, D., Kazimierczak,
W., Zięba, E., Lis, M., & Wawrzkiewicz, M.
(2024). Structural and physicochemical properties of glycerol-plasticized
edible films made from pea protein-based emulsions containing increasing
concentrations of candelilla wax or oleic acid. Molecules, 29(24), 5998.
43. Berube, M.-A., Schorr, D., Ball, R. J.,
Landry, V., & Blanchet, P. (2017). Determination of in situ esterification
parameters of citric acid-glycerol based polymers for wood impregnation. Journal
of Polymers and the Environment, 26(3), 970–979.
44. Diniz, C. S., Souza, P. P. de, &
Patrício, P. S. O. (2025). Viability of chemical modification of thermoplastic
starch with citric acid through reactive extrusion. Materials Research,
28, 595.
45. Santos-Iparraguirre, M., Chiralt,
A., Martin-Esparza, M. E., & González-Martínez, C. (2026). Low-starch
potato peel for the development of starch-based composites obtained by
thermocompression moulding. Sustainable Food
Technology, 4(2), 2171–2186.
46. Nurazzi, N. M., Asyraf, M. R. M., Rayung, M.,
Norrrahim, M. N. F., Shazleen,
S. S., Rani, M. S. A., Shafi, A. R., Aisyah, H. A., Radzi, M. H. M., Sabaruddin, F. A., Ilyas, R. A., Zainudin, E. S., &
Abdan, K. (2021). Thermogravimetric analysis properties of cellulosic natural
fiber polymer composites: A review on influence of chemical treatments. Polymers,
13(16), 2710.
47. Gutiérrez, P., Gervacio, A., & Valle, V.
(2026). Agro-industrial lignocellulosic microparticles as functional
reinforcements in sustainable poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan biofilms. Materials
& Design, 115881.
48. Wei, L., McDonald, A. G., & Freitag, C.
(2022). Starch-based biodegradable materials: Challenges and opportunities. Polymers,
14(8), 1603.
49. Anglčs, M., & Dufresne, A. (2000). Plasticized
starch/tunicin whiskers nanocomposites. 1. Structural analysis. Macromolecules,
33(22), 8344–8353.
50. Dufresne, A., & Castańo, J. (2016).
Polysaccharide nanomaterial reinforced starch nanocomposites: A review. Starch
– Stärke, 69(1–2), 307.
51. Mathew, A., & Dufresne, A. (2002).
Morphological investigation of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch
and tunicin whiskers. Biomacromolecules, 3(3), 609–617.
52. Maiti, S., Ray, D., Mitra, D., Sengupta, S.,
& Kar, T. (2011). Structural changes of starch/polyvinyl alcohol biocomposite films reinforced with microcrystalline
cellulose due to biodegradation in simulated aerobic compost environment. Journal
of Applied Polymer Science, 122(4), 2503–2511.
53. Bidari, R., Abdillah, A., Ponce, R., & Charles,
A. (2023). Characterization of biodegradable films made from taro peel (Colocasia
esculenta) starch. Polymers, 15(2), 338.
54. Ostadi, H., Hakimabadi,
S., Nabavi, F., Vossoughi, M., & Alemzadeh, I.
(2020). Enzymatic and soil burial degradation of corn starch/glycerol/sodium
montmorillonite nano composites. Polymers from Renewable Resources,
11(1–2), 15–29.
55. Yoon, H. S., Lee, J., & Park, K. (2013).
Cross-linked potato starch-based films using citric acid as crosslinker and
plasticizer. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(12),
2960–2970.
56. Namphonsane, N., Chai, S. S. P. J., & Charoen, P. K.
K. (2023). Toward a circular bioeconomy: Citric acid-modified thermoplastic
starch blends with improved moisture resistance. Membranes, 13(5), 458.