The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 17 No 2 (2013): 208 - 213

 

 

 

 

ANALYSIS OF CHROMIUM, MERCURY, SILVER AND ZINC IN HAIR SAMPLES FROM DENTISTS PRACTICING IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA

 

(Analisis Kromium, Raksa, Perak dan Zink Dalam Sampel Rambut Doktor Gigi

di Benghazi, Libya)

 

Intisar Alakili1*, Aiman. M. Bobaker1, Sukiman. B. Sarmani2

 

1Department of Chemistry,

Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya

 2School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology,

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E., Malaysia

 

*Corresponding author: mneimm@hotmail.com

 

 

Abstract

The measurements of mercury, zinc, chromium and silver in hair samples of dentists and control group were carried out by neutron activation analysis. Our results showed that, the level of mercury (mean ± standard deviation) in hair samples of dentists were 5.99 ± 2.64 mg/kg (range of 3.44 – 776 mg/kg) and for control group were 2.45 ± 0.62 mg/kg (range of 1.70 – 3.48 mg/kg) and the difference between the two groups was significant. A high level of zinc in hair samples of dentist and control group was also observed. The level of zinc in dentist was 1081.14 ± 495.36 mg/kg (range of 315 – 1770 mg/kg) while the mean level of zinc was 1862±1581.76mg/kg for the control group (ranged from 688 to 5256 mg/kg) which was found to be significantly higher than those for dentists. The mean levels of chromium and silver show no significant difference between dentists and control group. The hair mercury level of dentists was correlated to the number of weekly working hours, experience in years and age while gender, fish consumption and the number of dental amalgam in mouth of dentists were found to be uncorrelated to the level of mercury.

 

Keywords: dental amalgam, mercury, hair, dentist

 

References

1.       WHO (1994). Recommendation for Epidemiological Research on Mercury. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

2.       Sarmani, S & Alakili, I. ( 2004). Determination of total mercury and methylmercury in hair samples from residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia by neutron activation analysis. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 259(2): 261-264

3.       Khoo, K. S.,  Sarmani, S.B., & Abugassa, I. O. (2007). Determination of thermal to epithermal neutron flux ratio (f), epithermal neutron flux shape factor (alpha) and comparator factor (Fc) in the TRIGA Mark II Reactor. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (271)2: 419-424.

4.       Abugassa, I. O.,  Khrbish, Y.S., Ben Faid, N., Basir, A. T., & Sarmani,S. B. (2007). Installation of Kayzero-INAA standardization in the TNRC and its applications for trace elements determination in different materials. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry  271(1): 27-33.

5.       Yavar Alireza, Sukiman Sarmani, Abdul Khalik Wood, Nurul Syakireen Zainal, Kok Siong Khoo,( 2012). Development and implementation of Høgdahl convention and Westcott formalism for k0-NAA application at Malaysian Nuclear Agency reactor. Journal of  Radioanalytical and  Nuclear Chemistry 291:521–527.

6.       Scarlett, J.M., Gutenmann, W. H., & Lisk, D., J. (1988). A study of mercury in the hair of dentists and dental- related professionals in 1985 and subcohort comparison of 1972 and1985 mercury hair levels. Journal of Toxicology and  Environmental Health. 25(3): 373-81.

7.       Harakeh,S., Sabra, N., Kassak, K., & Doughan, B. (2002). Factors influencing total mercury levels among Lebanese dentists. Science of Total Environment 297:153 - 160

8.       Duncan, A., O'Reilly,  D. S., McDonald, E. B., Watkins, T. R., & Taylor, M. (2011). Thirty-five year review of a mercury monitoring service for Scottish dental practices. British  Dental  Journal 12(3): 210.

9.       Ott,  K., H., Grimmeisen, J., Alt, F., Messerschmidt, J., & Tölg, G. (1991). Mercury in the hair of dentists and dental personnel.  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z.  46(2):154-8.

10.    Tabatabaei, M., Golbabaei, F., & Shariatei, B. (2006).  Evaluation of urine mercury level of dentists in Tehran and its influencial factors. Journal of Dental Medicine 19(3): 66 – 75.

 

Previous                    Content                    Next