The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 16
No 3 (2012): 353 – 365
KEPEKATAN BEBAN
BAHAN PENCEMAR DI ALUR ILMU KAMPUS UKM BANGI: KAEDAH MIN KEPEKATAN PERISTIWA
(EMC)
(Loading
Concentrations of Pollutant in Alur Ilmu at UKM Bangi Campus: Event Mean
Concentration (EMC) Approach)
Haslinur Md Din1,
Mohd Ekhwan Toriman1, Mazlin Mokhtar2, Rahmah
Elfithri2, Nor Azlina Ab.Aziz1,
Nur Munirah Abdullah1, Mohd
Khairul Amri Kamarudin1
1Pusat
Pengajian Sosial, Pembangunan dan Persekitaran,
2Institut
Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600
UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
*Corresponding author: ekhwan@ukm.my
Abstrak
Beban pencemar
air dan luahan sungai adalah antara data asas dalam menentukan kedinamikan
sesebuah sungai. Input kualiti air dan luahan lazimnya boleh diperoleh melalui
pengambilan sampel air dilapangan ataupun dicerap secara automatik menggunakan
simpanan kawalan data. Artikel ini membincangkan beban pencemar kualiti air dan
hubungannya dengan luahan (m3/s) menggunakan kaedah Min Kepekatan Peristiwa (EMC) di Alur Ilmu UKM yang berpunca
dari hutan Diptorakap Simpan Bangi (2˚55’14.72”N 101˚46’57.37.”E).
Panjang Alur Ilmu adalah 1.79 km yang merentasi kampus induk Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia sebelum mengalir masuk ke Sungai Langat. Parameter oksigen
terlarut (DO) dan jumlah pepejal terlarut (TDS) diukur melalui stesen automatik
kualiti air model YK 615 yang dipasang pada hilir alur tersebut (2˚55’40.33”N
100˚46’47.15”E). Analisis makmal dilakukan bagi beban pencemar
kimia seperti ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), jumlah pepejal terampai
(TSS), permintaan oksigen biokimia (BOD) dan permintaan oksigen kimia (COD)
mengikut garis panduan American Public
Health Association (APHA, 2005). Kadar luahan masa normal Alur Ilmu dicatat
ialah 0.33(m3/s) dan luahan masa hujan maksimum ialah 13.04 (m3/s).
Jumlah anggaran beban pencemar mengikut kaedah EMC seperti DO (18.51±3.01 mg/L), TDS (794.92±186.72mg/L), BOD
(11.57±0.28mg/L), COD (201.29±1.55mg/l), TSS (470.03±27.63mg/L) dan ammonia
nitrogen (2.52±0.0mg/L). Ujian korelasi menunjukkan hubungan langsung antara jumlah hujan dan luahan (Q) serta beberapa beban
pencemar dengan R²=1 pada aras kesignifikan 0.05. Hasil kajian
juga mengklasifikasikan beberapa beban pencemar berada dalam kelas III dan
kelas IV seperti yang telah ditetapkan oleh Indeks Kualiti Air (IKA).
Kata kunci: Alur Ilmu, Luahan Sungai, Kualiti air, Min Kepekatan
Peristiwa, Korelasi
Abstract
Water pollutant loadings and river discharge are among the basic data
used in determining the dynamicity of
a river. The input of water quality and river discharge are usually available through
the collection of water samples in
the field or at the observatory, and are done automatically
using the data logger sensor. This paper discusses the concentrations pollutant load water quality and
its relationship with discharge (m3/s)
using Event Mean Concentration
(EMC) in the Alur
Ilmu, UKM source from the Diptrokarp forest at Hutan Simpan Bangi (2˚55'14.72 "N 101˚ 46'57.37"
E). Alur Ilmu is a 1.79 km long stretching
across the main campus of National University of Malaysia before flowing into the Langat River. Water quality was measured using automatic gauging and continuous water quality
stations which are
installed at downstream of Alur
Ilmu (2˚55'40.33 "N
100˚46'47.15" E) and involves in measuring the parameters of total dissolved solid (TDS)
and dissolved oxygen (DO) .Laboratory
analysis carried out for chemical parameters such as ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N),
total suspended solid (TSS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical
oxygen demand (COD) in accordance with guidelines American Public Health
Association (APHA, 1995). The normal discharge rate recorded at Alur Ilmu is
0.33 m3/s and the wet discharge is 13.04 m3/s.The total estimated pollutant loadings according to EMC as
DO (18.51 ± 3.01
mg / L), TDS (794.92
± 186.72 mg
/ L), BOD (11.57 ±
0.28 mg / L),
COD (201.29 ± 1.55mg
/ l), TSS (470.03 ± 27.63mg / L) and Ammonia Nitrogen
(2.52 ± 0.0
mg / L). Correlation
test showed a direct relationship between rainfall
and flow (Q) and
several pollutant loadings with R²=1 at a significance level of 0.05. The
study also classified some of the
pollutants concentrations in class
III and IV as determined by the Water Quality Index (WQI).
Keywords: Alur Ilmu, River Discharge, Water Quality, Event
Mean Concentrations, Correlation
Rujukan
1.
Nazahiyah. R., Yusop. Z & Abustan I.
(2007). Stormwater quality and pollution loading from an urban residential
catchment in Johor, Malaysia. Water
Sciences & Technology 56 (7):1-9.
2.
Laporan Tahunan Jabatan Alam Sekitar
2009. Atas talian (www.met.gov.my)
3.
Lee- Hyung Kim. (2003). Determination of
Event Mean Concentration and First Flush Criteria In Urban Runoff. Environmental Engineering Research, 8 (4):163-176.
4.
Brezonik P. L & Stadelmann T.H.
(2001). Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads, and
pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area,
Minnesota, USA. Water Resources
36:1743-1757.
5.
Wan Ruslan Ismail. (1994). Pengantar Hidrologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan
Bahasa dan Pustaka.
6.
Adam, B. J. & Papa, F. (2000). Urban stormwater management planning with
analytical probalistic models. New York: John Wiley and Son.
7.
Yusop,
Z., Tan, L.W., Ujang, Z., Mohamed, M. & Nasir, K.A. (2005). Runoff quality
and pollution loadings from a tropical urban catchment. Water Sciences & Technology, 52(9), 125–132.
8.
Nor Rohaizah Jamil., Mohd Ekhwan
Toriman., Mushrifah Idris & Ng Lee How. (2012). Analisis Ciri-ciri Luahan
Sungai Chini dan Sungai Paya Merapoh Tasik Chini, Pahang bagi Waktu Normal, Waktu Basah dan
Selepas banjir. Jurnal e-Bangi, 7
(1):1-16.
9.
Huber W C. (1993). Contaminant transport
in surface water. In: Handbook of Hydrology (Maidment D R. editor). New York:
McGraw Hill.
10.
Yusop, Z., Abdul Rahim, N & Douglas.
(2006). Dissolved and undissolved nutrient loading from secondary forest
catchment of Malaysia. For. Ecol. Manage,
224: 26-44.
11.
Mazlin Mokhtar., Chee Fong Hoe., Chong
Wai Leng., Ooi Yih Yong & Tan Bee Heong. (2005). Kajian kualiti air ‘Alur
Ilmu’ di kampus UKM Bangi: Ke arah pendekatan pengurusan sumber air bersepadu. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences,
12 (3):388-395.
12.
American Public Health Association (APHA). (2005).
Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water (19th ed.).
Washington DC, USA.
13.
Maliki Hapani. (2006). Pencemaran
kualiti air Lembangan Sg. Merbok: Kesan pencemaran dan Langkah pengurusan. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia.
14.
Sartor, J.D., Boyd, G.B. & Agardy,
F.J. (1974). Water pollution aspects of street surface contaminants. JWater Pollution Control 46: 458-467.
15.
Mazlin Mokhtar, Hassan Basri & Chia,
J.P. (1999). Pemonitoran Kualiti Air Kolam Pengoksidaan Kumbahan UKM, Bangi
Yang Mengalirkan Efluen Ke Sungai Langat. Prosiding
Symposium Penyelidikan Lembangan Langat, hlm. 155-170.
16.
Mohd Ekhwan & Kadaruddin. (1999).
Pemeliharaan Hidrologi Sungai Melalui Pembangunan Sisi-Hadapan Sungai Bandar. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Alam, Manusia
dan Pembangunan di Malaysia: Dasar, Strategi dan Kelestariannya. Anjuran
Persatuan Kebangsaan Geografi Malaysia & Jabatan Geografi, UKM, hlm 85-92.
17.
Mohd Noor. (2003). Status Pengurusan
Kualiti Air Sungai Langat. Kajian Kes dari Pangsun Hingga Ke West Country.
Tesis Sarjana Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
18.
Zaini Sakawi, Asmah Ahmad & Mohd
Hairimi Mohd Ali. (2009). Keterancaman kesihatan ekosistem Bukit Fraser: Impak
penjanaan sisa buangan. Prosiding Seminar
Bio-Kejuruteraan, Penilaian Ekosistem dan Spesies 2009. Shahzan Inn, Bukit
Fraser, Pahang. 13-15 April 2009.
19.
Azahan Awang., M.J. Jamaluddin., Md.
Suhaily. (2001). Status dan Pengurusan Kualiti Air Sungai Linggi. Dlm
Environmental Management 2001.M.J. Jamaluddin & M.N. Mohd Jailani (pnyt).
Proceeding National Seminar on Environmental Management: Current Development
& Future Planning. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 14-15 Ogos, 2011.
20.
Kim, L.H., Jeong SM., Ko SO. (2007).
Determination of first flush criteria using dynamics EMCs on highways storm
water runoff. Water Sciences Technology.
55:71-77.
21.
Sartor, J.D., Boyd, G.B. & Agardy,
F.J. (1974). Water pollution aspects of street surface contaminants. JWater Pollution Control 46: 458-467.